By Claudio Cecci
The first session organised by the EADI Working Group on Sustainable Development, Vulnerability and Resilience, has been organised in two separate debates. The first one is the prestentation of the paper “Official Development Assistance for Adaptive Capacity – The Effect of Training in Informal Urban Settlements in Ethiopia” by Stefano Moncada (presenter), Hilary Bambrick, and Marie Briguglio. The second has focused on future activities of the WG.
Stefano Moncada has emphasised the widespread acceptance in the literature that changes in climate will severely affect developing countries and the enhancement of adaptive capacity has been widely identified as an essential policy response. However, there is still a high degree of uncertainty as to what the determinants of adaptive capacity are at the local level, and which development interventions are capable of enhancing it. Continue reading
By Dr. Maja Bučar
The main focus of the conference as well as of the introductory panel is the role of middle classes of both, developed and developing world in development, especially in addressing the main challenges of polycentric world. Is it possible to mobilise middle class to address jointly the issues of rising inequality as well as responsibility for the sustainable “green” development? What kind of development actors are the middle class citizens across the world? Where can their pattern of behaviour take the world? How to mobilise middle classes of the fast growing economies/ regions to become development actors?
By Michelle van Geffen
Kees Biekart opened this panel discussion and pointed out that the session would dwell upon what different perspectives existed on how to strengthen global citizenship, whether they differed and how we could learn from one another.
Huib Huyse (from HIVA) starts off by illustrating the shift of development support. We used to consider ‘passive support for development policies’ to be the indicator of citizen involvement with the world. Hence, support for traditional donation/donor relations. Here we see consensus with the second speaker Edith van Ewijk. Both argue the agenda has been broadened. Huib argues one of the main aspects of global citizenship is whether the public also has a critically outlook of aid activity and appreciates the other related concepts like the environmental sustainable aspects as part of the agenda. Edith however shifts the focus towards behaviour and attitude of citizens to be a determinate of global citizenship. Which interventions do already exist within this framework, and what can we learn from them? Continue reading
By Alex Arnall
Bonn, Germany, is one of the main global centres for north-south development relations, particularly for climate change. The aim of this session was to explore how the idea of climate change passes from the arena of international negotiations, down to the local level (and vice versa), and is interpreted by development actors working at the ‘coalface’ of adaptation projects, with a particular focus on Africa. It was not the intention of the session to question the phenomenon of climate change per se, which is acknowledged as a serious challenge for humankind, but rather to examine how climate change adaptation it is being put into practice by governments and development agencies, and to explore what the politics and outcomes of these processes are.